Security minister Ayanda Dlodlo at war with spy chiefs

President Ramaphosa likely to be called in to quell crippling conflict in South Africa’s intelligence services South Africa’s top intelligence chiefs are engaged in a high-stakes war with State Security Minister Ayanda Dlodlo, a stand-off President Cyril Ramaphosa will most likely be drawn into to mediate.

City Press has learnt that, for months now, there have been deep tensions between Dlodlo on the one hand, and State Security Agency (SSA) acting director-general Loyiso Jafta and head of the domestic branch of the SSA Mahlodi Muofhe on the other.

Both officials are said to be close to the president. It is understood that there have even been calls by allies of the two men for Dlodlo to be removed. The conflict and disagreements taking place behind closed doors regarding how the intelligence agencies are run and what kind of powers the minister has came out into the open during a spate of violent xenophobic attacks last month, with Dlodlo expressing frustration over the seeming inability of the SSA to get to grips with what was happening on the ground.

City Press has seen explosive letters in which Dlodlo writes to Muofhe demanding explanations and plans to obviate situations such as the xenophobic attacks.

But Dlodlo received an equally stinging response from Muofhe, who boasted that the intelligence sector had excelled, and that Ramaphosa and Police Minister Bheki Cele had praised the work of the SSA. Repeatedly referring to Ramaphosa as “His Excellency”, he pointed out that the president had attributed his responses to the violence to the guidance given by the SSA.

Twelve people died and 639 people were arrested during the xenophobic unrest, which began in Pretoria and made its way into Johannesburg’s city centre. The violence led to the censure of South Africa by a number of African countries, as well as the refusal by Zambia and Madagascar to honour invitations to play Bafana Bafana.

At the time, crime intelligence services came under scrutiny, with questions being asked about why they had been unable to detect the undercurrent of violence beforehand and help stop the unrest once it was under way. South Africans asked whether the country had any intelligence services at all.

Then police spokesperson Brigadier Vishnu Naidoo described the violence as “spontaneous” and said that “it stemmed from a flat that was burnt by a jealous lover”. He said the attackers were “opportunistic criminals”.

When asked about the failure to act on the intelligence provided on the attacks, Naidoo said: “Intelligence is classified and privileged information that I am not prepared to discuss publicly.”

In a letter to Muofhe on September 18, Dlodlo wrote: “The current socioeconomic instability has brought both domestic and international attention to us as the country and to our role in the service. To date I have received few reports outlining what has actually transpired and not assisting government in making sound policy decisions … I have not received any tangible plan and improvement of product strategy to ensure that we timeously detect, analyse and disseminate actionable intelligence to the client and to other stakeholders.”

Dlodlo asked to be presented with an engagement strategy on how best to address the issue. The strategy should ensure that intelligence is at the centre of forewarning and in assisting government to take right policy positions.” Two days later, Muofhe hit back in a strong letter to Dlodlo, defending his work.

“Since I assumed responsibility as director of the domestic branch, shortcomings identified were attended to and addressed on a continuous basis. The products received thus far have assisted government to arrest some volatile situations, which would have been worse had it not been for the timely intervention of the intelligence services. This is also borne by the fact that the minister of police, Mr Bheki Cele, publicly thanked the intelligence services. He indicated that the SA Police Service interventions were successful due to cooperation with intelligence. It was in the same letter that Muofhe referred to his refusal to intercept communication of a target as directed by the minister without the approval of a judge.

News24 has published details of the dispute between Muofhe and Dlodlo.

The minister has denied that she issued such an instruction, but those close to her argue that, under section 7 of the Rica Act, interceptions on an emergency basis are allowed, and the worsening violence would merit the invocation of such powers. City Press understands that Muofhe’s boasts about praise from the president have created the impression that he wields far more influence than the minister.

Talk in intelligence circles is that if the conflict is not contained, Ramaphosa would move to remove the minister rather than Muofhe, who was handpicked by the president for the position.

Muofhe, an advocate, was a key player in the CR17 campaign that led to Ramaphosa winning the ANC presidency. Muofhe was previously chief governance officer for the Special Investigating Unit and had recently occupied a position as adviser to Dlodlo’s predecessor, Dipuo Letsatsi-Duba.

In other news – NPA in the dark on Jacob Zuma’s next move in corruption trial

The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is in the dark on former president Jacob Zuma’s next legal move regarding his corruption charges.

Zuma is facing a litany of corruption, fraud and money laundering charges stemming from the late 1990s multibillion arms deal where it is alleged he received bribes via convicted Durban fraudster, Schabir Shaik. Read more

Source: News24