Hate speech matter postponed as Mngxitama decides he needs a lawyer
A hate speech case brought against Black First Land First leader Andile Mngxitama after he made controversial remarks about killing white people was postponed on Wednesday. AfriForum took Mngxitama to the equality court over comments he made at a rally in Potchefstroom in North West on December 8 2018. Mngxitama urged supporters to kill five white people for every black person killed.
“You kill one of us, we will kill five of you. We will kill their women, we will kill their children, we will kill their dogs, we will kill their cats, we kill anything that comes for us,” said Mngxitama.
The equality court, sitting at the Johannesburg magistrate’s court, postponed the matter to allow the parties to file documents and for Mngxitama to consult a legal representative.
Khalipa Mafungo, Mngxitama’s lawyer, told the court he had received instructions only on Saturday. The postponement was to also allow media companies to file an application to film proceedings. AfriForum did not object to the media recording proceedings.
Advocate Mark Oppenheimer suggested leading evidence by AfriForum’s deputy chief executive Ernst Roets on camera before the postponement. We can start by leading evidence in relation to the video of Mngxitama and have the matter part heard,” said Oppenheimer. Mafungo submitted that allowing the media to film proceedings on Wednesday would be an ambush of the BLF, as he had not had enough time to prepare for the case. Speaking after the matter was postponed, Mngxitama said his utterances about killing were in response to a statement allegedly made by businessman Johann Rupert.
“This case is not about what we said. It’s about what Johann Rupert said; Johann Rupert’s threat of unleashing a militia to the taxi industry. That is what we were responding to,” Mngxitama said. Roets said the BLF had previously indicated that they would represent themselves. “They arrived only this morning with a lawyer and the lawyer said he has not been fully briefed and they want the matter postponed.”
He said AfriForum believed the case should be covered by the media. According to Roets, the BLF wanted to file a complaint against Johann Rupert and have the two matters joined.I don’t think it’s going to work like that. The two matters are only vaguely related,” Roets said. He said AfriForum wanted the court to declare Mngxitama’s comments as hate speech and for him to apologise. We want the comments declared hate speech and for them to refrain from making that comment or similar comment in future.
You might also like…EFF demands that Judge Seriti be held liable for costs
The Economic Freedom Fighters said Judge Willie Seriti, who chaired the commission of inquiry into the controversial arms deal and those who appointed him, must be held liable for the costs after his findings were overturned by the high court in Pretoria on Wednesday.
Corruption Watch and Right2Know brought an application to set aside the findings of the commission which both organisations argued misled the public by exonerating politicians and public servants. The EFF said it would be an insult not hold Seriti liable for costs after the inquiry racked up a bill of almost R140 million, and still failed to make adverse findings on people who were implicated. Read more
Source: Timeslive
